Other efforts have included Humdrum and MuseData.Įfforts at a standard called MusicXML are underway but have been greeted with less than total elation by industry and users. There has been little interest in using Lilypond's grammar as a standard, perhaps because it is frequently revised.Ī music Tex project was once undertaken but appears to be dormant at this time. The most prominent open-source music engraving tool is Lilypond, which defines its own input grammar. The proprietary systems interoperate to a degree through use of converter programs, and their vendors have not supported any serious attempt at a standard. Evolution of a standard has been compromised by multiple, competing, proprietary systems.On the other hand, many popular music scores are printed with considerable white space. Some types of classical scores are printed with very little space between the notes. Layout requirements vary from one piece to the next and are a matter of judgement.The alphabet of symbols used is larger than the Latin alphabet, and there are a wide number of attributes that relate to a staff or note. Even considering only those aspects of music notation that are quite standard, there is a great deal of complexity to the notation system.Determining proper spacing and proper use of line breaks is difficult. Unlike scientific formulae, musical notation can be lengthy, running to dozens of pages for a single movement.Expressive words and marks, unusual meters, clefs, staff arrangements, and noteheads complicate the effort to define a context-free grammar for describing music. Music notation is not completely standardized.Music, on the other hand, is written using symbols that have important relative relationships a note above another note means something different than the same two notes spaced apart horizontally. Except in special cases such as poetry or scientific formulae the relative location of symbols carries little meaning, aside from simple paragraph breaks, subscripts, and superscripts. Text is sequential it is made up of symbols that are displayed in order. Music notation is inherently more position-sensitive than text.4.3 Other proposed and experimental implementationsĪ standardized way of encoding musical notation has proven to be an elusive goal, despite a clear demand and a good deal of technical attention.3 The open possibilities of music markup in wikipedia.2 Present State of Affairs at Wikipedia.GrafZahl solved this issue with the "Score" extension to MediaWiki. The new Music:Namespace can be used and all music would be inserted in templates, so as not to clog original articles. And it automatically outputs either a graphical printer-friendly sheet music or a hearable MIDI file, which normally is only a few bytes long, as it is transformed into music by the visitor's computer, saving wikimedia's server space and bandwidth. Musical notation made simple and editable, as a true wikipedia article. The Lilypond feature of wikitex does exactly that in an elegant wiki way. But sometimes, it is better to host not the audio file, but the sheet music itself.Īs TeX-based math markup is being implemented and automatic map generation is contemplated, it has been suggested that we also provide a handy way to include musical notation, such as via GNU Lilypond. Music is an important aspect of any digital encyclopedia, and ogg files are surely the right choice when it is important to hear the original recording, speeches, singer voices and other effects. Some example usage is at enwiki and the extension's own page. The Score extension was deployed on and Bug 189 has been closed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |